Thursday, November 19, 2009

The Question of Albums vs. Shuffle

A quick glance of any last.fm profile will reveal something important about the user that might be more important than what kind of music they listen to: how they listen to their music. Indeed, fan pages on the site are devoted both to those who prefer shuffling their libraries and those who claim that albums are meant to be listened to whole and message boards full of flame wars seek to find out just who is right.

In the earlier days of recorded music, listeners could only choose between the 45 rpm single and the 33 rpm album. No in-betweens. In fact, the idea of the album only came about in the late '50s, so to claim that albums were, from the beginning of time, designed to be listened to as a cohesive unit is spurious.

However, these arguments are not without merit -- when concept albums became a more regular feature and more importantly, became commercially successful, artists switched from the singles-driven market to the album-driven market. The songs became longer and less radio-friendly, while the albums became more cohesive and started to feature songs that ran right into each other. The answer to the debate of shuffle vs. "straight-through play" is one that will not quiet any message boards any time soon: it depends.

The albums which are best suited to unshuffled play are those which are constructed such. While you may be able to get through something designed to be played in a club such as Lady Gaga's The Fame [of which a review should be coming shortly] without needing any heavy context, I challenge you to keep your player on shuffle through The Decemberists' The Hazards Of Love [of which a review might be coming someday] without becoming rather confused. The same reason for this is the same reason many albums just sound better straight-though: it tells a story.

Whether it's an obvious "here's-the-fucking-story" kind of chronicle, or a more subtle "we're-just-gonna-tie-this-together-really-really-well" type, albums that feature a narrative demand to be played in order. But, then again, largely, it's up to you.

1 comment:

  1. I have never understood how people can listen to their music on shuffle all the time. It's understandable once in a while, but always? I know people who will select an album on their iPod but then play the songs shuffled. Even when I'm not in the mood to listen to an entire album, I hand pick which songs I listen to.

    I'm a strong supporter of listening to complete albums. If not always, at least once in a while. If I hear a song I like on the radio, often I'll start humming the following song in my head. Nowadays, most people don't even know the order of songs - even on their favorite albums! I'm only 19, so I don't remember the days of vinyl prevalence. I do remember when kids still bought CDs on a regular basis, though, and listened to them on their Walkmans.

    Times are definitely changing, and rapidly. My younger brother laughs at me for buying CDs, and he doesn't have a single full album on his iPod. I won't try too hard to persuade, though. After all, they're the ones missing out, not me.

    ReplyDelete